Similarities:
- HBO show, with all that that entails, including the next bullet
- liberal violence and sexuality, though Rome is slightly tamer than GoT
- grand political arc sprinkled with many subplots
- general tone
- kinda trashy, kinda sophisticated
- Ciaran Hinds, Indira Varma, Tobias Menzies (what a power trio of names). I even think The Hound made a cameo
Differences:
- GoT is somehow much more interesting, partly because you don't know the ending ahead of time, partly because it's probably a better production team. Maybe Martin is a better foundation than history. But lots of Rome is fictionalized, so you'd think with a great writing team the Caesar era would show great potential
- one is pure fiction, the other stays pretty close to history's general outline
- I had almost zero practical reason for watching GoT, at a time when I was super strict with TV, yet I watched it anyway; I have practical reason for Rome, and I'm not as strict anymore, yet I don't feel riveted to its continuation
- I've never heard a single person talk about Rome; I couldn't avoid GoT
- I kind of love GoT; I shall NEVER love Rome!
No comments:
Post a Comment