Andrew Talks About Movies, Etc.
Saturday, May 2, 2026
American History X
Tuesday, April 21, 2026
Superman (2025)
Antidirectional to the Pattinson Batman initiative, this DC outing seems to be even sillier than Marvel. I only watched about half of it, but the tone was so airy that I couldn't feel anything. Interestingly, that's the same and opposite problem I had with The Batman, which was so bleak that I couldn't feel anything. Superman is so colorful that no one is human and I don't care, The Batman is so gray that everyone is doomed, thus I don't care. Why is DC doing such opposite things at the same time? Aren't we all trying to unify brands these days, creating branded universes so we can incessantly force-feed the same old stuff to the masses? I'm confused about DC's identity; maybe they are too.
Of course, despite all of this, part of me wants to finish the movie. I doubt I will though -- it's so empty for me.
Saturday, April 18, 2026
Wednesday, April 15, 2026
Kanye Last Song Standing
- TLOP
- LR
- MBDTF
- Graduation
- College Dropout
- Yeezus
- 808s
- Heard Em Say
- Everything I Am
- 30 Hours
- St Pablo
Sunday, April 12, 2026
Some things are more fun to recommend than to experience. They're like someone handing you a flyer on the street like "here, you throw this away." Dogtooth and Antichrist are fun to talk about and convince someone else to watch. Everyone has War and Peace but no one reads it.
Alien
I expected more than thrills from Alien. Science fiction has a philosophical connotation to me, but Alien, unless I missed some symbolism, was just a thriller set in space. It borrowed aesthetics from 2001 but none of its pondering. Yet what a thriller it was! I liked the bleak direction: for a lot of the horror, there was no music or even screaming, just panting and sweating. Weaver toward the end was a marvel in her desperation. I also particularly liked Bilbo's performance -- for someone playing a robot, he may have acted more humanly than anyone else! That's good acting for 1979. Unfortunately some of the effects showed their age -- the alien itself, the explosion of the ship, the severed head -- but a lot of the effects were surprisingly effective, like the early form of the thing when it's on Kane's face, and what spills out of Ash, etc. There was some bad dialogue, but more awesome intensity than I expected for a movie from the 70s. How did Kubrick manage to control the cheese so well in 1968? Largely by avoiding dialogue, and avoiding entertainment -- entertainment ages faster than art. What's humorous or cool to the mainstream fades fast by its very nature. Humor and a sense of cool are inherently transient. Kubrick skipped both, dealing just with humanity's biggest questions and with clean, brutal visuals. So his movie ages better than almost any other sci fi. Alien kept some of that brutality though, so I'm pleased to say I enjoyed it all these years later. I just wish it had dealt with more interesting ideas, if I am to watch any of the others in the series.
I tend to think of classic sci-fi as either philosophical or allegorical. It's just a genre that ages so fast, unless it lean heavily on timeless ideas. Star Wars leans too much on visual effects, fun ideas, cool style, personality, humor, and enough basic stimulation to sell out theaters. Now, I think the story of Star Wars cuts some classic arcs, but it's leaning too heavily on these other things which age so fast. If sci-fi is typically supposed to be an exciting glimpse of the future, it by definition ages quicker than other genres focused on the past or on timeless ideas. Its speculation and special effects go outdated so fast. 2001 dodges this by focusing on themes that have persisted throughout human history, and by austere visuals as opposed to hovercraft races and laser guns, and by minimalism instead of personality. It's less massively appealing in the year it's released than Star Wars, but it ages better. The old Star Trek series are an interesting case of aging terribly in terms of technical achievement, but aging gracefully in terms of thematic content. They knowingly eschewed big-budget effects and focused on almost stage-like situations. I'm speaking pretty ignorantly though... I haven't seen much Star Trek and I really haven't seen much sci fi in general. 2001 aged the best, Alien aged pretty well because it's minimalistic in a lot of ways, Star Wars aged worst because it rode the heat of the moment. Interstellar probably won't age very well, though I love it right now. Even now I know it's so cheesy. Maybe it'll be one of those classics that nobody really enjoys anymore, come 2050. Nobody except my generation. I expect Nolan movies to go that way in general -- beloved by my generation, cheesy to all future, even if they're still technically known as classics.