Were viewers invested in the emotional arc? Did they cry? Did they laugh out loud? Or was this just entertainment -- arresting their attention for 25 minutes in a novel medium? If Avatar inspired such awe in 2009, I'm sure Chaplin could have in 1917 with his deeper artistry and his blooming medium.
I'm interested, poised to admire. I wouldn't mind watching another. Familiarity with Chaplin seems valuable, as a ruler and trivia boon. The movie wasn't unenjoyable, just a little tired, so I'm hoping the longer and later features are also richer. Otherwise it'll be tough. But I value the frame of reference in contextualizing the rest of film.
No comments:
Post a Comment